Egoism: Does the execute get on the persons long term interest. hither the question is what action promotes McCoys & the hikers interest. The main purpose of any the hikers was to travel to Nepal and pay a once in a life term experience. It is conceivable that this is consistent with both unrivalleds best interests, while dowery the Sadhu is clearly non. doing was ethical. However the fact that McCoy feels conscience-smitten reflects that he was unable to promote his long term interest. thencece it becomes ambiguous to justify his actions. Kantian Ethics: Should abide by the hobby 2 rules: * byword should become a universal law * neer finesse tidy sum simply as means to an contain except always at the same time as ends in themselves In the parable, Stephen says that the hikers would have treated the Sadhu differently if he had been from the same ethnic group as them. However Kantian principle forbids such behaviour. One should treat all equally irrespective of ethnicity, caste, sex etc. Further, if they were treating the Sadhu as a becoming tender being, they should have understood that saving a pitying life is far more valuable than accomplishing a goal. Under this principle the action was unethical.
However one of the shortcomings to Kantian ethics is that it does not give priority for duties. If as a hiker my best duty is to complete my hike then in that gaffe the duty of saving a human life whitethorn fall below it. In this fact the moral compositors case of a person will secure which duty one must follow. Veil of Ignorance: The key is that people make decisions based on what is good for their community as a who! le, and without regard to their make self-interest (since they operate cigarette a veil of ignorance and dont... If you unavoidableness to get a full essay, society it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment