E-Commerce and Protecting Intellectual Property Essay Example for Free

E-Commerce and Protecting Intellectual Property moveIntroductionE-commerce has become a prosperous industry which generated more than $262 billion in sales finish year. It is estimated by 2017 that E-commerce leave behind grow to to $440 billion in sales for a compound annual offset rate (CAGR) of 13.8% (Forbes, 2013). With this much growth, it beckons entrepreneurs to grab a piece of the pie. As healthy occupation in Ecommerce increases, the activity of cooking is bound to rise as well. The issue of mind piracy is becoming an increasing problem, an issue that must be addressed feder each(prenominal)y in line with Article 1 Section 8 of the joined States Constitution. Intellectual Property (IP)Intellectual berth is any creation of the mind, be it tangible or intangible. It is to be cherished by federal statutory laws, such as patents, copyright, and denounces, as set forth in the Constitution. Article 1 Section 8 describes the power granted to Congress in order to prote ct the wellbeing of the United States and its citizens. In this article it states Congress has the right to promote the progress of science and reusable arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries (Cornell University Law School, 2014).ProtectionThe legal protection offered to knowing property can either be a patent, copyright or trademark enforced by federal law for a given period. A copyright protects literature and elegant works. A patent is granted to the originator of an invention and gives them the right to decide how the creation shall be used. A trademark is a sign, emblem, signature, or mark used to distinguish a companys goods or services from one company to thenext. Though businesses are granted legal protection in these manners, they will always direct the issue of piracy to contend with, and the need for the federal government to intervene against these activities.congressional DutyCong ress has a liability and a duty to protect the intellectual property of companies and individuals who have taken the legal steps to safeguard their works and findings. They cannot be dissuaded by the pressures of those who do not call up that someone elses intellectual property rights should be a barrier to their ability to make specie (Hanna, 2013). During the 2012-2013 National Football League (NFL) season, the NFL in cooperation with the U.S. government seized a record $13.6 million worth of counterfeit NFL merchandise (Hanna, 2013). The counterfeiting of merchandise is not limited to the NFL, major brands like Nike, Oakley, Tommy Hilfiger, to name a few, have all fallen victim to this malicious crime. Policymakers, in conjunction with internet service providers (ISP), and manufacturers must work in concert in an effort to develop reasonable cost effective solutions to combat intellectual piracy.Conclusion piracy of intellectual property is far from a victimless crime. It affec ts not only the manufacturers and consumer, but also the number of jobs created by the legal selling of merchandise. Congress has a duty, which has been set forth in the Constitution, to protect the intellectual property of companies and individuals alike, even after trademarks, patents, and copyrights have been issued. It will take combine effort from our government, ISPs, and manufactures to combat the stealing of intellectual property while continuing to promote online freedom.ReferencesCornell University Law School. (2014). U.S. Constitution. Retrieved from http//www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articlei Forbes. (2013, October 02). Ecommerce Is Growing Nicely While Mcommerce Is On A Tear. Retrieved from http//www.forbes.com/sites/chuckjones/2013/10/02/ecommerce-is-growing-nicely-while-mcommerce-is-on-a-tear Hanna, C. (2013, March 07). Washington must get serious about protecting intellectual property. Retrieved from